Bagrawat Etc. v. Rukma Etc.

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.02.04 13:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-1505-1992 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1505-1992 (O&M) Date of decision : 01.02.2019 Bagrawat and others ... Appellants

Versus

Rukma and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the appellants.

None for respondent No.1.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that despite sincere efforts, his clients have not contacted. I am of the view that the parties must have reconciled with the factual aspects.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

Liberty is granted to revive the matter, in case, something survives.

01.02.2019 Yogesh Sharma ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No