The Gurdaspur Co-Op Sugar Mills v. State Of Pb And Others

CWP No.18935 of 2001 {1}


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.18935 of 2001 Date of Decision: 05.02.2020 The Gurdaspur Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., Gurdaspur Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Mr. M.J.S. Bedi, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

**** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) [1] This writ petition has been filed for quashing order [Annexure P-7] by which the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed being premature.

[2] The brief facts are that vide document [Annexure P-4], notice was issued to the petitioner to deposit special road tax against which the petitioner filed an appeal which, mentioned above, was dismissed being premature.

[3] The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that even though Annexure P-4 appears to be a notice, yet it is a final order.

[4] We find that this argument cannot be accepted as the PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.02.06 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh

CWP No.18935 of 2001 {2} preliminary objection No.2 which was taken by the respondents to the appeal filed by the petitioner clearly states that appeal is liable to be dismissed because no order has been passed and that is what has been specifically held by the appellate authority. [5] In the circumstances, the petition is dismissed. [6] Since the petition is dismissed, the pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

[AJAY TEWARI] JUDGE [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE February 05, 2020
    

         



    PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.02.06 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh