Jeet Pal v. Hari Singh
!
"#$ %&%& #'#( "#$% %)%&
*+,-#./ 00 ,,+#* 1 + --#./+#"*/ 0#"
#* 2$3 4526
67
! ! "!##$ !
% !
$#$$ & #
'
"! &#! ( ! # !# "!
)
*$$'+ ,-./012 3,4 , 5 &
)6)' &! 7%/&& /.7 878
.96'7 :
% * !
₹)+++6 " & # & <
! &
/
3 ,5 !
2 3
& %$= !
$ !& ,8 +8 ,-9.012 3'4 !
& ; !&= #
#! !&#& '+ ,-./2! !&# = '5 &
$ ! & 1 ! #$ % # "!!! =#!! & = $ !!
'8 +/ ,-.-
#$ #$ > "! 3 <! )+ +/ ,--'
$ !# & '+ ,-./
.
2 # ! !##!
-
(# #$> "!#$ ! ,8 +8 ,-9. 012 3'4 5 ;
! ,' % +/ & & )./
/7' .9 ''0/ .4?
-) '09 ,74?# !
" ! & ,8 +8 ,-9.#$ "
!
'8',-9- @! &'- +- ,-.+012 3)4# & 0 )./4 & ? $ = ( ! = !
#$= #& ## & (!!#$ "!'+ ,-./012 3,4 =#$ # !&# &2 &# "!!
,+
A ! =
/.7 & "! $& 3
$ ! & =#$ ! ,8 +8 ,-9. 012 3'4 ,' % +/ & & )./ /7'
B$ !&#= $& !'+ ,-./012 3,4! # & $2 ( !
"# ! #$ '#$$,8 +8 ,-9. !#$ '#$$ '+ ,-./012 3,4
,, ( ! "! $
$ ! "!# $ & C!
12.
In "P. Chandrasekharan and Others vs S. Kanakarajan & Others"2007(3) RCR(Civil) 543, it has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that though as a general rule, High Court will not interfere with the concurrent findings of the Courts below, but it is not an absolute rule. Some of the well recognised exceptions are where:
(i) the courts below have ignored material evidence or acted on no evidence;
(ii) the Courts have drawn wrong inferences from proved facts by applying the law erroneously; or (iii) the courts have wrongly cast the burden of proof. 13.
In the present case, this Court does not find any of the exceptions mentioned above to be applicable in the findings of fact given concurrently by the Courts below.
,/
! # $& & #$
2+8% 7%& 96:
#'
= % 6 D6 = # D6