Mahinder Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP-5625-2022(O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5625-2022(O&M) Date of decision : 28.04.2026 Mahinder Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA

Present:

Mr. Vikram Rathore, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Additional AG, Haryana.

***** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (Oral) In the present writ petition, the petitioner is praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.3 to appoint the petitioner on the post of Constable (Commando), on the ground that he has secured 66.8% marks, which are stated to be higher than those obtained by the last selected candidate i.e. 66.2% marks. 2.

A short reply dated 21.11.2023 has been filed on behalf of respondent No. 3. A perusal of paragraph 7 of the said reply reveals that, as per respondent No.3, i.e. the Haryana Staff Selection Commission, the petitioner has secured 65 marks, whereas the last selected candidate in the petitioner's category, namely the SC category, has secured 66.20 marks. It is further stated therein that the cut-off marks for the waiting list in the said category were 65.60 marks. 3.

Taking into consideration the aforesaid averments made in paragraph 7 of the reply dated 21.11.2023, it is evident that the DIWAKER GULATI 2026.04.28 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -1-

CWP-5625-2022(O&M) petitioner has secured less marks in his category than the last selected candidate.

4.

In view of the above, no relief can be granted to the petitioner.

5.

Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. 6.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed of.

28.04.2026 (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) d.gulati JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned :

Yes No Whether Reportable :

Yes No DIWAKER GULATI 2026.04.28 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2-