Naveen Yadav v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-10559-2023 Date of decision : July 30, 2024 Naveen Yadav ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present :

Ms Sanchi Bindra, Advocate and Mr. Ghanshyam Meena, Advocate, for Mr. Amar Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner KULDEEP TIWARI,J. (ORAL) 1.

The grievance raised through the instant petition, is that the application for discharge, filed by the present petitioner, was dismissed, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram, and even the charges have been framed illegally. Both the orders are revisable. Instead of filing the revision under the relevant provisions of law, the petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., which, in fact, is a misconceived motion. 2.

Dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to make an appropriate motion, to redress his grievance, if any. ( KULDEEP TIWARI ) July 30, 2024 JUDGE 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2024.08.01 23:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document