Vikas Issar & ANR v. Ranjana Duggal & ANR

CRM-M-1884-2011 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1884-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 16, 2015 Vikas Issar and another ......Petitioners

Versus

Smt.Ranjana Duggal and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Atul Lakhanpal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Udhamjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Angel Sharma, Advocate for Mr.D.D.Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr.Pawan Gaur, DAG, Haryana.

......

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned senior counsel prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioners to raise all the points before the appropriate Forum at appropriate stage in accordance with law.

Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection MEENU 2015.09.17 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-1884-2011 (O&M) -2to the above prayer.

The present petition is disposed of with the liberty aforesaid.

In case the petitioners, who are stated to be in service, move an application for grant of exemption from their personal appearance on each date of hearing, the same shall be considered sympathetically.

September 16, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.09.17 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh