Amrik Singh v. State Of Punjab And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14355-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 4, 2015 Amrik Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.F.S.Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.P.S.Paul, DAG, Punjab.

Mr.Jagnahar Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the State, assisted by learned counsel for the informant-respondent No.2, submits that after filing of the report under Section 173, Cr.P.C., learned trial Court has taken cognizance and even the charges have been framed. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to take recourse of the alternative remedies available to him under law.

Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. September 4, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.09.07 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh