Sahina v. State Of Haryana, Through Its Chief Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-4815-2026 Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 SAHINA

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Sarfaraj Anjum Mor, Advocate with Ms. Manisha Mashaal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G. Haryana (assisted by Mr. Ravi Kumar, Naib Tehsildar, Ferozepur Thirka) *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to correct and rectify the name of petitioner's village.

2.

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.

3.

Disposed of 4.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE April 07, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.07 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document