Bal Raj Singh v. Harbans Singh

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh RSA-1092-1989 (O & M) Date of Decision: January 15, 2020 BAL RAJ SINGH .....APPELLANT

VERSUS

HARBANS SINGH AND ORS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Mr.Gagandeep Singh Virk, Advocate for Mr. Abhinav Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant(s).

None for respondents No.10 to 12.

**** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant contends that he has intimated the orders of the Court to the appellant and has sought the addresses of unserved respondents No.5 to 8 but he has not received any response from the appellant. His reminders did not evoke any response. He, therefore, pleads no instructions.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Liberty to apply.

(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE January 15, 2020 A.Kaundal Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No AMIT KAUNDAL 2020.01.15 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh