Krishan Kumar v. Shri Murli Manohar Thatheran Panchayati Mandir & Dharamshala Samiti

INCOMP-1217-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH (141) INCOMP-1217-2026 Date of Decision : 27.05.2026 Krishan Kumar ...Appellant

Versus

Shri Murli Monohar Thatheran Panchayati Mandir and Dharamshala Samiti (Registered) and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

Present:

None.

*** Amarinder Singh Grewal, J. (Oral) 1.

Present regular second appeal was filed in the year 2026 wherein, objection was raised by the Registry and thereafter, no one has bothered to clear the said objection and the incomplete appeal is still pending with the Registry of this Court and the same has been listed so as to weed out the same as the appeal is consuming limited space available. 2.

As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. The same was not taken back for re-filing too after the removal of objections and the case is listed before the Court for orders.

3.

Keeping in view the fact that no one has come forward to clear the objection raised by the Registry so as to get the appeal listed despite the KANCHAN 2026.05.29 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

INCOMP-1217-2026 fact that note was published in the cause list for the information of the respective counsel to clear the objection in the cases which are lying pending with the Registry, the appeal needs no consideration for passing any order and the same be consigned to the record room. 4.

Disposed of.

May 27, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) kanchan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KANCHAN 2026.05.29 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment