Vishal Kumar v. State Of Punjab

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M- 9043 of 2020 Date of Decision: 05.10. 2020 Vishal Kumar ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Jashandeep Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Ms. Samina Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

This is third petition for grant of regular bail pending trial in a criminal case arising from FIR No. 12, dated 20.02.2019, registered under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1985 Act") and Section 186, 149, 224, 332, 353 & 511 IPC, at Police Station Balianwali, Bhatinda, District Bhatinda. As per the case of the prosecution, the petitioner was allegedly apprehended with 20 grams of heroin. Later, on his disclosure statement, 980 tablets of Tramadol were recorded.

Ms. Samina Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, has pointed out that the petitioner has already been convicted in three cases under the 1985 Act, arising from different FIRs. DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2020.10.06 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M- 9043 of 2020 Keeping in view the antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant the concession of regular bail to him. Hence, the present petition is dismissed.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge October 05, 2020 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2020.10.06 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document