Ranjit Singh @ Rana Singh v. State Of Punjab
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14810 of 2015 Date of Decision:20.7.2015 Ranjit Singh @ Rana Singh --Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Punjab --Respondent.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Mr. Jasmandeep, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Additional A.G. Punjab.
Ms. Satinder Kaur, Advocate for the complainant.
**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 136 dated 30.12.2014, under Sections 379/382/506/148/149 IPC registered at Police Station Sarai Amant Khan, District Tarn Taran. Notice of motion was issued and interim protection was granted.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Amarjeet Singh, submits that in compliance of the order dated 7.5.2015 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation. Recovery has been effected from the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner is no more required for the purpose of any further investigation.
AMIT KUMAR 2015.07.21 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-M-14810 of 2015 Learned counsel for the complainant vehemently contended that conduct of the petitioner disentitles him for the concession of anticipatory bail. She prays for dismissal of the present petition.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after careful perusal of the record of the case this Court is of the considered opinion that in the given fact situation of the present case, petitioner has been found entitled for the concession of anticipatory bail. It is so said, because since the investigation is already complete, petitioner is no more required for custodial interrogation by the investigating agency. Further, recovery has already been effected from the petitioner.
In view of the above and without commenting anything further on the merits of the case, lest it should prejudice the rights of either of the parties, present petition is allowed and order dated 7.5.2015 passed by this Court is hereby made absolute, however, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. Disposed of, accordingly.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 20.7.2015 AK Sharma AMIT KUMAR 2015.07.21 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document