High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/8987/2020dismissed

Saddik Mohd. v. State Of Haryana And Another

2021-08-19Mr. Justice Raj Mohan Singh2 pages

CRM-M No.8987 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.8987 of 2020 Date of Decision:19.08.2021 Saddik Mohd.

......Petitioner Vs State of Haryana and anr .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:Mr.Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajat Gautam, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ravi Malik, Advocate for the complainant.

**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral) The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 (2) Cr.P.C, seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2, vide order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mewat in case bearing FIR No.0047 dated 19.02.2019 registered under Sections 420, 467, 471, 120-B IPC at Police Station Punhana District Nuh. Allegation against respondent No.2 is of preparing a fake general power of attorney in favour of Rahul and Mumtaz on 18.01.2019 by impersonating himself as Lala Ram son of Hukmi. Respondent No.2 is also Lala Ram son of Hukmi. General power of attorney was registered with Sub Registrar AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2021.08.27 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.8987 of 2020 Jewar. In pursuance of interim bail granted by the Court of Session, respondent No.2 joined the investigation to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. Original general power of attorney had already been recovered. No request for further interrogation was made by the prosecution, therefore, interim order dated 29.01.2020 was made absolute by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nuh on 07.02.2020. Since the offence is relatable to documents, recovery had already been effected, therefore, anticipatory bail was confirmed in favour of respondent No.2.

Today, learned State counsel submitted that challan in this case has been submitted to Court.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I find no ground to interfere in the present case. Respondent No.2 had already joined the investigation and had also facilitated the recovery. Even challan has already been submitted to Court. At this stage, no inference is called for in the impugned order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mewat.

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.

(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) 19.08.2021 JUDGE Amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2021.08.27 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document