High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/11373/2022allowed

Pramod v. State Of Punjab

2022-09-30Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-11373-2022 -1101+209

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11373-2022(O&M) Date of Decision: September 30, 2022 Pramod .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.Jaswinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sandeep Kumar, DAG, Punjab.

Complainant/respondent No.2 in person with Mr.Rakesh Gupta, Advocate.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) CRM-37231-2022 Application is allowed as prayed for. Annexures P-5 to P-9 are taken on record.

CRM-29438-2022 Application is allowed as prayed for. Annexures C-1 and C-2 are taken on record.

CRM-M-11373-2022 Petitioner has preferred the instant petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0007, dated 25.02.2022, registered under Sections 406, 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Women, District Patiala, Punjab. Vide order dated 27.04.2022, the petitioner was directed to join investigation.

MEENU 2022.09.30 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-11373-2022 -2It has been submitted by counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the order dated 27.04.2022, the petitioner has joined the investigation. He has further submitted that the parties appeared before the Medication Centre, however, the matter could not be resolved as the parties could not arrive at any amicable settlement.

Learned counsel for the complainant has also submitted that though the parties appeared before the Mediation Centre but the mediation remained unsuccessful due to adamant attitude of the petitioner. Learned State counsel on instructions from HC Mander Singh endorsed the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is no more required for further investigation. He further submits that the complainant did not identify the recovered articles.

In view of the above, the interim order dated 27.04.2022, is made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Petition stands allowed.

September 30, 2022 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2022.09.30 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment