Sahildeep Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11649-2022 Date of Decision: 21.03.2022 Sahildeep Singh ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Jaspreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab.

(Through Video Conferencing) **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance directions to respondents No. 2 and 3 to take appropriate action on the representation (Annexure P-15) which was supplemented with statement dated 24.02.2022 (Annexure P-19).

Notice served upon the official respondents No. 1 to 3 through the State's counsel.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied in case directions may be issued to competent person to decide the representation (Annexure P-15) which was supplemented with statement dated 24.02.2022 (Annexure P-19) in a time bound manner. He further submits that he would not be pressing his prayer for protection at this stage and seeks liberty to come for that prayer, if need arises.

The prayer being innocuous is not opposed by the learned State counsel. Given above, the present petition is disposed of by issuing direction to respondent No. 2-Commissioner of Police, Amritsar to decide representation (Annexure P-15) coupled with statement dated 24.02.2022 (Annexure P-19) by passing a speaking order within six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. JYOTI 2022.03.23 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-11649-2022 -2In case, the grievance of the petitioner still exists, he shall be at liberty to avail legal remedy in accordance with law including approaching this Court. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 21.03.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No


JYOTI 2022.03.23 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document