Joginder Singh Etc v. Battan Singh Etc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (107-1) RSA-793-1992 AND IOIN-RSA-793-1992 Date of decision:- 02.04.2025 Joginder Singh and others ...Appellants

Versus

Battan Singh (since deceased) through LRS and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- None for the appellants.

Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate, with Mr. Davinder Kumar, Advocate for LRs of respondent No.1.

...

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1.

Counsel represented the parties have pleaded that no instructions, as is reflected from order dated 05.11.2024, passed by this Court. 2.

As per office report, appellants No.1, 2 and 4, have expired. Although, appellant No.3, has been served, but there is no representation on his behalf. Some of the respondents have also reported to be died. 3.

It seems that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the instant appeal.

4.

Dismissed in default for want of prosecution. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 02.04.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.04.02 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.