High Court of Punjab and HaryanaRSA/803/1992disposed of

Shyam Sunder Purohit v. Kurda Ram

2023-09-12Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA-803-1992 Decided on : 12.09.2023 Shyam Sunder Purohit . . . Appellant(s)

Versus

Kurda Ram . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the appellant(s).

Mr. R.K. Girdwal, Advocate for the respondent(s).

**** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1.

Learned counsel for the appellant informs the Court that there is no interest left in the disputed property of the appellant (plaintiff) - Sham Sunder Purohit, as the same has been disposed of, during the pendency of present appeal before this Court. Thus, he prays that present appeal be disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. 2.

Learned counsel for the respondent pleads no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant. 3.

Accordingly, on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the appellant, present appeal is disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE September 12, 2023 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2023.09.13 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document