Joginder Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Another

    



 !" !# !$!! !
!#! # 

#%% & '( )*+,

-.

 

 

     

 - .

'

  

  

 

     


! &  /"0 1 2
 !32 !     

 !      "## $$%&'  (&((    ) (  "##$$%$*  (&(( 

 +, -.

    .  !      "## $$%$*  (&((    ) (  /  "##$$%&'  (&(( !32 ! , 1- *.

      2 3   -4 ) $5  $& $& (&($  ! /'$ /(/  

! /' 6"  76 ) 8(  8 $& (&($  ! /(/ /'$  

! /'

6" 9 ! /&' 6"         ) (*  (& $( (&($:

    !  2  -! 72  

  3 !    ,      !,,  (* $ (&((

    76       ! 
 

 !    4   

  

  ;

$& (&($      !       !  !

               ,   ,

        !    !,,   ,

< 5 '

(&((     !    

3  = !     , ! 

   !,,    /& '

(&((  !      !,,    4   4 !!    ! 7           !    !!   4     !

  !

, 

7

!

   " 




    

   

!

"#

 #
 

     

   

     





  





 

 The Supreme Court in Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of Gujarat and another, 2017 AIR (SC) 4843 laid down the broad principles governing the exercises of powers of quashing of FIR. It was held that the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to be exercised by the High Court to secure the ends of justice, to prevent abuse of any process of law and in cases where in view of the

 5 compromise the possibility of conviction is remote and continuation of proceeding will cause oppression and prejudice. 1he parties are relatives. With the intervention of friends and relatives, they have decided to forget and forgive and to save their relations to an extent possible. No useful purpose would be served by continuing with the trial. Due to compromise, there are bleak chances of conviction. To meet the ends of justice, the FIR and the DDR mentioned above and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. The petition  

  !4       !       !! ! -AVNEESH JHINGAN .

# 15th July, 2022 !

>   =2

 >