High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRR(F)/253/2020dismissed

Manpreet Singh v. Kiranjit Kaur And Another

2022-12-07Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRR(F)-253-2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR(F)-253-2020 Date of Decision: December 07, 2022 Manpreet Singh ......Petitioner

Versus

Kiranjit Kaur and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.Vipin Mahajan, Advocate with Mr.Amit Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) Instant revision petition has been filed impugning the order dated 06.01.2020 vide which learned Family Court, Gurdaspur, has granted maintenance @ Rs.11,000/- per month to respondent No.1 and @ Rs.5,000/- per month to respondent No.2/minor.

It is contended that the learned Family Court has failed to appreciate the evidence produced on record and thus, has drawn a wrong conclusion in awarding the total maintenance amounting to Rs.16,000/- per month to the respondents. He submits that petitioner has the responsibility towards his parents also. It is also submitted that the respondent/wife has left the matrimonial home without any rhyme and reasons and thus, she is not entitled for maintenance as awarded by the learned Family Court. Heard.

After hearing counsel for the petitioner and perusing the record, it is apparent that both the parties appeared before the learned Family Court and they made an agreement regarding payment of maintenance. The MEENU 2022.12.07 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CRR(F)-253-2020 -2learned Family Court recorded the statement of parties on 06.01.2020 wherein the petitioner has stated that he is ready to pay the total maintenance of Rs.16,000/- per month to the respondents, i.e. wife and the minor. Once the petitioner and respondent/wife duly agreed for the maintenance awarded, it does not lie in the mouth of the petitioner to say that the Court has drawn a wrong conclusion. Learned Family Court has awarded the maintenance, as agreed between the parties.

In the facts and circumstances, this Court does not find any infirmity in the opinion formed by the learned Family Court. Resultantly, the present petition being devoid of any merit, is hereby dismissed. December 07, 2022 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2022.12.07 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment