← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/1513/2015disposed of

Jagpinderjeet Singh @ Lovely And ORS v. State Of Punjab & ORS

2015-05-25Mr. Justice S.C. Malte2 pages



          Date of decision: 25th May, 2015  Jagpinderjeet Singh @ Lovely and others Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others Respondents            1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Munish Raj, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

Mr. Gopal S. Nahel, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 7.

  !"

# Report dated 23.02.2015 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangrur has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant persons namely Malkeet Singh, Inderjit Kaur, Harnek Singh, Harinder Singh, Darshan Singh and Kulwinder Singh as well as accused persons namely Jagpinderjit Singh @ Lovely, Chamkaur Singh, Hardeep Singh, Harjeet Singh @ Kaka, Jagtar Singh @ Jaggi, Jagdeep Singh, Amarjeet Singh, Gurwinder RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.26 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    Singh @ Golu, Sukhchain @ Shalli Singh, Daljit Singh, Harpreet Singh son of Darbara Singh, Harpreet Singh son of Nathu Singh, Jagsir Singh and Gurcharan Singh, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise arrived at between the parties is an outcome of voluntariness, free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a case of version and cross6version, the fact that parties belong to the same village and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute by putting an end to the enmity and in bringing about peace and harmony for the betterment of their future lives, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of DDR No.49 dated 04.10.2014 under Sections 341/323/324/506/148/149 IPC in case FIR No.142 dated 04.10.2014 registered at Police Station Bhawanigarh, District Sangrur and all consequences arising thereof are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

"

  #   $%!   RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.26 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court