← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCOCP/844/2026disposed of

Ramesh Chander Sharma And Others v. Alok Shekhar And Another

2026-05-04Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP No.844 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-04.05.2026 Ramesh Chander Sharma and others .....Petitioners.

Versus

Alok Shekhar, IAS and another .....Respondents.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Madan Lal Saini, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Shiny Chopra, AAG, Punjab.

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.(Oral) The instant contempt petition alleges willful disobedience of order dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed in CWP-14441-2025, vide which the following directions were passed:- "5.

Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.4-Superintending Engineer, Canal and Dam Circle, Water Resources Department, Hoshiarpur, to decide the claim raised by the petitioners in the present writ petition by treating the same as a comprehensive representation and to pass a speaking and reasoned order thereupon in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and a copy of present petition along with accompanying Annexures."

YAG DUTT 2026.05.05 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

COCP No.844 of 2026 (O&M) -22.

Learned State counsel has produced a compliance report, as per which, speaking order dated 20.04.2026 (Annexure R-1) has been passed. A copy thereof has been furnished to learned counsel for the petitioners.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the same, the petitioners do not wish to press the instant petition, at this stage and shall, if so advised, avail all such remedies as shall be admissible in law against the said speaking order.

4.

That being so, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court.

5.

The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule stands discharged.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) May 04, 2026 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.05.05 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.