Harjeet Singh v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-1621-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1621-2016 Date of decision: 06.02.2020 Harjeeet Singh ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ..... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Satnam Sishodia, Advocate for Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Girdhar, Addl. AG, Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Through this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for quashing order dated 03.03.2015 (Annexure P-15) of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kurukshetra, declaring the petitioner as proclaimed offender, in spite of order dated 27.11.2014 (Annexure P-11) of this Court in CRM-M-43764-2013, arising out of case FIR No. 256 dated 29.07.2013 (Annexure P-8) under Sections 148, 149 and 302 IPC at Police Station Shahbad, District Kurukshetra.

Proxy counsel for the petitioner prays for adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is suffering from cancer, which is strongly opposed by learned State counsel.

Heard.

Connected CWP-6056-2014, of the petitioner and others, has been dismissed by this Court vide separate order of even date, in view of RISHU KATARIA 2020.02.12 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-1621-2016 -2declaration of the petitioner, a proclaimed offender, vide order Annexure P-15, by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kuruksherta. Therefore, the instant petition is not maintainable and the same is dismissed.

The detailed orders of even date separately passed in connected CRM-M-43764-2013, Surjit Singh and another Vs. State of Haryana and others and CWP-6056-2014, Munisha Saini and others Vs. State of Haryana, shall also form part of this order.

February 06, 2020 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2020.02.12 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document