High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/9421/2019dismissed

Hoshiyar Singh Saini v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

2019-03-01Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-9421 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 01, 2019 Hoshiyar Singh Saini

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms.Monika Jalota, DAG, Punjab for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in complaint case No.177 dated 05.11.2016 under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act titled as 'Kartar Singh vs. Hoshiar Singh Saini.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that it is a complaint case and the petitioner has been declared proclaimed offender in this case. Learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Gurugram, vide order dated 07.04.2018, accepted the anticipatory bail application of the present petitioner and directed the petitioner to appear before the trial Court on or before 13.04.2018 and to VINEET GULATI 2019.03.05 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-9421 of 2019 -2furnish bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court, failing which, relief of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been taken as cancelled and petitioner was further directed to deposit `20,000/- with the trial court on his appearance, which shall be adjusted in the ultimate adjudication in the case. Since then, the petitioner, neither deposited the amount of `20,000/- nor surrendered before the trial court. Now, after long period of 10 months, again the petitioner has filed this present petition for grant of anticipatory bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstance of the present case that petitioner has not complied with the conditions as ordered by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Gurugram, while accepting the anticipatory bail application, I do not find any ground to grant benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

March 01, 2019 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2019.03.05 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh