Mandhir Maan v. State Of Haryana And ANR

-1CRM-M-16225 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16225 of 2018 Date of Decision: 11.03.2019 Mandhir Maan

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Mr. Amit Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Muthreja, DAG, Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Through instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for quashing impugned order dated 11.04.2018 of the learned Sessions Judge, Faridabad, directing the petitioner to furnish bank guarantee or FDR to the extent of `15,00,000/- in favour of the complainant while deciding application under Section 389(3) Cr.P.C. Heard.

This Court is not inclined to differ with the impugned order. However, in the interest of justice, impugned order is modified to the extent that 50% of the cheque amount so ordered by the Appellate Court shall be deposited by the petitioner in the name of the Appellate Court before the Appellate Court within 15 days from today, who shall convert the same in the shape of STDR in some nationalised bank fetching maximum rate of interest to save loss of interest to the party, who shall finally be held entitled for the same. It is observed that this order is not going to cause any harm or RAVINDER SINGH 2019.03.16 12:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2CRM-M-16225 of 2018 loss whatsoever in any manner to the petitioner inasmuch as, in case, petitioner succeeds in his appeal, he is not going to suffer any lose of interest.

In case of non-compliance of this order, appeal of the petitioner shall be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Disposed of.

(RAMENDRA JAIN) March 11, 2019 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2019.03.16 12:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document