Khushpreet Singh Alias Khushia(Now Confined In Central Jail Bathinda) v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M No.9558 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.9558 of 2019 Decided on: 06.03.2019 Khushpreet Singh @ Khushia ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present :
Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sidakmeet Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'Cr.P.C.') in FIR No.55 dated 19.07.2014, for offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 506, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC') (challan submitted under Sections 341, 323, 325, 506, 34 IPC), registered at Police Station Balianwali, District Bathinda. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was granted regular bail and was facing the trial, however, on 24.04.2018, the petitioner absented from the Court proceedings and his bail/surety bonds were cancelled and non-bailable warrants were issued and thereafter, he was re-arrested on 17.12.2018.
It is further submitted that the petitioner is facing the trial and his non-appearance was on account of the ill health of his mother and therefore, he had taken her i.e. the mother of the petitioner, to Uttar Pradesh (U.P.) for her treatment MOHD YAKUB 2019.03.
CRM-M No.9558 of 2019 and, thus, could not appear before the trial Court. Counsel for the State, has filed the Custody Certificate today in the Court and has not disputed the custody period of the petitioner and further submits that since the petitioner absented from the Court proceedings, he was booked in another FIR under Section 174-A IPC, in which he is on bail. It is further submitted that if bail is granted to the petitioner, he may again abscond from the process of law.
Without commenting anything on merits of the case, considering the fact that the petitioner was facing the trial for a period of about 04 years after he was granted regular bail and again he is in custody for the last 02 months and 18 days, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate and on payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- to be deposited with the District Legal Services Authority, Bathinda. The payment of costs shall be a pre-condition before accepting the bail/surety bonds of the petitioner. However, it will be open for the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail of the petitioner, in case he is found involved in any other case or misusing the concession of bail, in any manner.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE 06.03.
Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2019.03.06 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh