High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/15407/2017allowed

Chandan Arora And ORS. v. State Of Punjab Andanr.

2017-05-30Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-15407-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-15407-2017 Date of decision : 30.05.2017 Chandan Arora and others ......Petitioners versus State of Punjab and anr.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Gaurav Pratap Sigh Pathania, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Anmol Grewal, DAG, Punjab Mr. Parminder Singh-I, Advocate for respondent No. 2 **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Quashing of FIR No. 26 dated 27.02.2017 under Section 406/498-A/34 IPC, registered at Police Station City Phagwara, District Kapurthala, is being sought on the basis of compromise deed dated 31.03.2017 (Annexure P-4).

Respondent No. 2 got married to petitioner No. 1 on 14.01.2015 . Due to temperamental differences, both the parties could not live together as husband and wife. The relationship between them became strained and F.I.R was registered against the petitioners on account of harassment and humiliation caused by the petitioner on the pretext of bringing less dowry by respondent No. 2.

However, the matter has now been duly compromised, vide compromise deed dated 31.03.2017 (Annexure P-4). In compliance of order dated 04.05.2017, report dated GAURAV ARORA 2017.06.12 12:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-15407-2017 29.05.2017 of Sub Divn. Judl. Magistrate, Phagwara has been received in this regard. As per report, statement of the complainant, witness Mohinder Pal Sharma and joint statement of petitioners have been recorded and they stated that the matter has been duly compromised between them. The compromise has been entered voluntarily. The complainant stated that she has no objection if the F.I.R be quashed against the petitioners. Consequently, in view of the status report dated 29.05.2017 and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in cases of Dr. Arvind Barsaul etc. versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 910, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation.

Accordingly, FIR No. 26 dated 27.02.2017 under Section 406/498-A/34 IPC, registered at Police Station City Phagwara, District Kapurthala, is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioners.

The petition stands disposed of.

30.05.2017 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2017.06.12 12:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh