Harshul Virendera & ORS v. State Of Haryana & ANR

Crl. Misc. No. M-15414 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-15414 of 2017 Date of decision : 30.05.2017 Harshul Virendera and others ......Petitioners versus State of Haryana and anr.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. J.S. Malik, Advocate with Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana Mr. Surinder Paul, Advocate for respondent No. 2 **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Quashing of FIR No. 241 dated 16.08.2015 under Sections 406/498-A/506/34 IPC, registered at Police Station PGIMS, Rohtak, is being sought on the basis of compromise deed dated 12.01.2017 (Annexure P-3) Respondent No. 2 got married to petitioner No. 1 on 02.12.2012. Due to temperamental differences, both the parties could not live together as husband and wife. The relationship between them became strained and F.I.R was registered against the petitioners on account of harassment and humiliation caused by the petitioners on the pretext of bringing less dowry by respondent No. 2.

However, the matter has now been duly compromised, on the basis of compromise deed dated 12.01.2017 (Annexure P-3). In compliance of order dated 05.05.2017, report dated 26.05.2017 of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rohtak has been received in this regard. As per report, separate statement of the complainant and joint GAURAV ARORA 2017.06.02 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-15414 of 2017 statement of petitioners had been recorded and they stated that the matter has been duly compromised between them. The compromise has been entered voluntarily. The complainant has no objection if the F.I.R be quashed against the petitioners.

Consequently, in view of the status report dated 26.05.2017 and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in cases of Dr. Arvind Barsaul etc. versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 910, Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 429 and the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation.

Accordingly, FIR No. 241 dated 16.08.2015 under Sections 406/498-A/506/34 IPC, registered at Police Station PGIMS, Rohtak is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioners.

The petition stands disposed of.

30.05.2017 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2017.06.02 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh