Sunil@ Banda v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-15469 of 2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15469 of 2015 Date of Decision : 18.05.2015 Sunil @ Banda .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH

Present:

Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.

R.P. Nagrath, J. (Oral) Petitioner seeks bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 153 dated 09.05.2011 for offences under Sections 392 and 397 of Indian Penal Code (IPC), registered at Police Station Kundli, District Sonepat.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State counsel and perused the paper-book.

All the eye-witnesses including the complainant when examined by the trial Court have not identified the petitioner. As per prosecution story, the cash amount of ` 24,000/- was recovered from the petitioner. The money looted by the miscreants was the sale proceeds of petrol filling station which was to be deposited in the bank. The petitioner was arrested on 29.10.2011. It is further submitted that Jai Bhagwan the coaccused was arrested on 06.05.2012 and from him recovery of Santro car was made in which robbers came and committed the JITENDER KUMAR 2015.05.19 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-15469 of 2015 -2robbery.

The petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2011 and it will take time in conclusion of the trial.

In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed and the petitioner be admitted to bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

May 18, 2015 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) jk JUDGE JITENDER KUMAR 2015.05.19 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh