← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/19973/2011disposed of

Surjit Singh v. State Of Haryana

2015-10-20Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain2 pages

KAPIL 2015.10.21 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-19973-2011 [1] *** In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM-M-19973-2011 Date of Decision:20.10.2015 Surjit Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate (Legal aid) for the petitioner.

Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, AAG, Haryana .

***** SABINA, J.

This petition was received through jail. Petitioner has prayed that he had faced trial in two cases under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985('NDPS' Act' for short) and had been convicted and sentenced by the trial Court in the said cases. Petitioner has prayed that the sentence qua imprisonment in both the cases be ordered to run concurrently.

So far as FIR No.272, dated 23.07.1997, under Section 15 of NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Bhattu Kalan is concerned, petitioner was convicted and was sentenced to undergo 10 years of rigorous imprisonment vide order dated 24.08.2009. Petitioner was also convicted and

KAPIL 2015.10.21 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-19973-2011 [2] *** sentenced qua commission of offence punishable under Section 15 of the NDPS Act in FIR No.10, dated 11.01.2007, registered at Police Station Sadar Mansa. So far as Criminal appeal No.1082-SB-1999 filed by the petitioner in this Court qua FIR No.272 dated 23.07.1997, under Section 15 of NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Bhattu Kala is concerned, the same was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 26.08.2008. Presently, petitioner is undergoing the sentence in the said case. So far as the criminal appeal No.2605-SB2009 with regard to FIR No.10, dated 11.01.2007, under Section 15 of NDPS Act, P.S. Sadar Mansa is concerned, the same is still pending in this Court.

The prayer now made by the petitioner by way of this petition can be made by him at the time of decision of Criminal Appeal No.2605-SB-2009. Hence, at this stage no ground for interference, is made out.

Petition stands disposed of, accordingly.

October 20, 2015 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE