Tido v. Sarli And ORS.

RSA No.573 of 1989 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.573 of 1989 Date of decision:01.04.2019 Tido ... Appellant Vs.

Sarli and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- None for the appellant.

Mr. Umesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) This Court, on 29.01.2019 passed the following order:- "The appellants were being represented by Mr. R.A.Yadav, Advocate and he has not been appearing since 1993. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. This Court on 31.10.2014 directed the Registry to notify the date of hearing to the counsel representing the parties. As per office report, letters have been sent to them. Thereafter, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

Let notice be sent to the appellant at the address given in the memo of parties for 11.03.2019 in order to make arrangement."

As per office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back unserved with the report that "appellant has died". SAVITA KADIAN 2019.04.02 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

RSA No.573 of 1989 {2} It seems that legal representatives of appellant are not interested in pursuing the matter.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE April 01, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2019.04.02 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh