Som Raj v. Pawan Kumar And ANR

YOGESH SHARMA 2020.03.06 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-1545-2020 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR-1545-2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 03.03.2020 Som Raj ... Petitioner

Versus

Pawan Kumar and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Present:

Mr. J.K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) The present revision petition has been filed for a direction to the Trial Court to decide the matter expeditiously. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the suit was filed in the year 2017 and since then, the Trial Court has not decided the injunction application nor any issue has been framed. It has also been contended that an application for amendment of the plaint was also filed by the plaintiff-petitioner which is also pending since more than one and a half years. In view thereof, the Trial Court be directed to decide the matter expeditiously.

Since the prayer made is totally innocuous, hence, I do not deem it necessary to issue notice of motion and call upon the other side. In view of the facts of the present case, the present revision petition is disposed off with a request to the Trial Court to try and decide the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2, as well as the application under

YOGESH SHARMA 2020.03.06 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-1545-2020 (O&M) Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, as also to try and decide the main suit expeditiously. The revision petition is disposed off, with the aforesaid observation.

( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE 03.03.2020 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No