← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/1560/2017allowed

Renu v. State Of Haryana

2017-01-27Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-1560 of 2017 .....

Date of decision:27.1.2017 Renu

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kuldeep Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.420 dated 18.9.2016 registered for the offences under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 23 and 29 of Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 and Section 120-B IPC at Police Station City Tohana, District Fatehabad. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Kuldeep Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana appearing for the respondentHarpal Singh Parmar 2017.01.30 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-1560 of 2017 [2] State and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. She has been nominated by the co-accused. As per the allegations, during Police remand on 28.11.2016, the present petitioner-Renu got recovered machine for foetus sex determination test and an amount of `20,000/-.

The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 26.11.2016. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the final disposal of the case. Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to her furnishing personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

January 27, 2017.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No Harpal Singh Parmar 2017.01.30 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh