Nishan Singh v. Dr. Sushil Malik, Hcs, Adc. Kaithal

[212]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF

F PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGA ARH COCP-83 34-2026 (O&M) Decision : 20.04.2026 Date of D ingh versus Nishan Si Dr. Sush Commissi Coram :

Present:

...Petitioner

hil Malik, HCS, Additional Deputy ioner, Kaithal, District Kaithal, Haryana ....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Nitish Kumar, Advocate Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Paramjeet Singh, DAG, H **** for Mr. Jarnail Singh Saneta, Haryana.

J JAIN, J. (ORAL) PANKAJ [1] At the outset, learned State Counsel, submits that the orde er stands com mplied with.

[2] Learned counsel for the petiti ioner does not dispute the afores said statement t.

[3] In view of the above, no fu urther orders are required to b e passed. T The present contempt petition is a accordingly disposed off.

[4] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand ds disposed o off.

(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 20.04.202 'R. Sharma'

Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable :

Yes/No :

Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.20 18:21 I agree to specified portions of this document