← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/10274/2025allowed

Davinder Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Another

2025-05-19Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRM-M-10274-2025 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10274-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.05.2025 Davinder Singh and others ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Bhanu Chaudhary, Advocate and Ms. Ekta Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. *** H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) CRM- 20062 -2025 This application has been filed for placing on record the affidavit of the complainant as Annexure P-4.

Allowed as prayed for and affidavit of the complainant in original as Annexure P-4 has been taken on record.

Main case:

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-'BNSS') for quashing of criminal complaint No.35 dated 09.10.2020 under Sections 295, 324,326,148,149, 506 of IPC pending before learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate at Sardulgarh, Mansa and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 28.01.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2.

Notice of motion.

3.

Mr. Kamalpreet Bawa, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned State counsel states that no other FIR has been registered against the petitioners and they have no known criminal antecedents. Renu Rawat 2025.05.27 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-10274-2025 (O&M) -24.

Mr. Kanhiya Goyal Advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. He has filed his memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 in the Court today and the same is taken on record. He confirms the factum of the compromise having been effected between the parties and states that respondent No. 2 has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question.

5.

In that view of the matter, even if this case is taken to its logical conclusion, it would only be an exercise in futility as the parties have already settled their differences. Therefore, no purpose would be served in wasting the time and resources of the State in pursuing this case to its pre-ordained end. It would, therefore, be better to give a quietus to the issue at this stage. 6.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and criminal complaint No.35 dated 09.10.2020 Sections 295, 324,326,148,149, 506 of IPC pending before learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate at Sardulgarh, Mansa and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 28.01.2025 (Annexure P-2) shall stand quashed qua the petitioners. 7.

Pending applications, if any, shall also be disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) JUDGE 19.05.2025 renu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.05.27 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document