Rafakat @ Bhura v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M No.15647 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.05.2017 Rafakat @ Bhura

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. AMOL RATTAN SINGH

Present:

Ms. Rosi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikas Chopra, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. AMOL RATTAN SINGH J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., seeking 'regular bail' to the petitioner in case FIR No.435 dated 16.06.2016, registered at Police Station Sector 55, District Faridabad, for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 307, 365, 323 and 452 of the NDPS Act, 1985.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not named in the FIR registered by one Sharukh, but later, on Sharukhs' wife Naseema's statement, on account of whose marriage to Sharukh the occurrence has taken place, he was named as one of the persons who came to take her away from her husband's house.

Keeping in view the aforesaid circumstances, but without making any final comment upon the actual merits of the case, which would obviously be gone into by the learned trial Court, I consider it appropriate to admit the petitioner to bail, upon his furnishing adequate bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Faridabad.

(AMOL RATTAN SINGH) 10.05.2017 JUDGE adhikari Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No Virendra Singh Adhikari 2017.05.16 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh