Pardeep v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M-16518-2018 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-16518 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 20, 2018 Pardeep ......PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Lakshay Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
Ms. Dimple Jain, A.A.G. Haryana.
Ms. Janya Sirohi, Advocate for Mr. Askshay Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the complainant.
******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.109 dated 22.02.2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 148, 323, 379B, 427, 452, 596, 511 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code and 25 of Arms Act, at Police Station Qilla Panipat. Heard.
Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Rajesh Kumar submits that petitioner has since joined the investigation, which is still in progress but his custodial interrogation is no more required for the purpose of further investigation.
Sachin Mehta 2018.07.20 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
CRM-M-16518-2018 -2In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 21.04.2018 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court;
(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) July 20, 2018 JUDGE Sachin M.
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2018.07.20 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh