Arvind Setia And ANR v. State (Union Territory Chandigarh) And ANR




    
    

  Date of decision: 10th March, 2015  Arvind Setia and another  Petitioners

Versus

State (UT Chandigarh) and another  Respondents     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Rajiv Trikha, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deepinder Brar, APP, UT Chandigarh

 "
#$ !% Report of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh dated 12.02.2015 has been received which has recorded its satisfaction that the submissions of the parties who have affected compromise is an outcome of bona fide to resolve and end the dispute. In the light of the same, and in view of the fact that compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute and to bring about personal harmony among the parties who being young can start their lives afresh and in view of which the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.167 dated RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.11 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   22.05.2012 registered at Police Station Sector 31, Chandigarh under Sections 406/498<A IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

$  "
%   &'() #


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.11 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court