Balwant Singh v. Raj Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.898 of 1989 (O&M) Date of decision:29.01.2019 Balwant Singh (dead) through LRs ... Appellant Vs.

Raj Singh ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- None for the appellant.

Mr. Umesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) As per office report, notice issued to appellant (i) has been received back unserved with the report that residing with in-laws, (ii) not found present at the time of service and (iii) not residing at the given address. Appellant (iv) and (v) have been served. However there is no represent on their behalf.

It seems that legal representatives of appellant are not interested in pursuing the matter.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 29, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2019.01.30 13:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh