High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/9328/2020disposed of

Mahabir Parsad v. State Of Haryana

2022-03-11Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9328-2020 Date of Decision: 11.03.2022 Mahabir Parsad ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Manoj K. Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

(Through Video Conferencing) **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Rajesh submits that charges have been framed and three witnesses stand examined. A perusal of the petition reveals that the prayer clause is for quashing of FIR whereas charges have already been framed. Given above, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file fresh petition challenging the charges also. Disposed of having been withdrawn with a liberty to file fresh, if so advised.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 11.03.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.03.11 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document