Manoj @ Monu v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-15687 of 2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15687 of 2015 Date of Decision : 21.05.2015 Manoj @ Monu .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH

Present:

Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.

R.P. Nagrath, J. (Oral) Petitioner seeks bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 57 dated 13.02.2014 for offences under Sections 395, 365 and 171 of Indian Penal Code (IPC), registered at Police Station Sadar Gohana, District Sonepat.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State counsel and perused the paper-book.

Vijender, driver of complainant Satyawan has given the names of four persons, namely; Sunil, Sandeep, Amit and Kishan to be the culprits. The name of petitioner figured on 25.2.2015 in the disclosure statement made by the other co-accused. No recovery was made from the petitioner after he was arrested. The case of petitioner is similar to the case of Virender co-accused, who has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 06.02.2015 passed in CRM-M-3429 of 2015. The petitioner is in custody since 25.02.2014 and it will JITENDER KUMAR 2015.05.21 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-15687 of 2015 -2take time in conclusion of the trial.

In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed and the petitioner be admitted to bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

May 21, 2015 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) jk JUDGE JITENDER KUMAR 2015.05.21 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh