Manjit Kaur v. Bachan Singh
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.02.11 12:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-986-1989 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH RSA-986-1989 (O&M) Date of decision : 06.02.2019 Manjit Kaur and another ... Appellants
Versus
Bachan Singh and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:
None.
**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) This Court vide order dated 13.09.2018 while noticing that counsel for the appellant has passed away, has issued the notice to the appellants.
As per office report, notice issued to the appellants has been received back with the report that died.
There is no representation on behalf of the respondents. It appears that the legal representatives of the appellant(s) must have reconciled with the factual aspect as the appeal is pending since 1989. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
Stay granted on 30.05.1989 is ordered to be vacated. 06.02.2019 Yogesh Sharma ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No