Savitri And ORS. v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

CRM-M-18577-2013 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18577-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 8, 2015 Savitri and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Gobind Dhanda, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioners to challenge the summoning order by filing criminal revision petition before the Court of Session at the first instance.

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the above prayer.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with permission to the petitioners to file criminal revision petition before the Court of Session at the first PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.10.09 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-18577-2013 (O&M) instance.

It is directed that in the event the petitioners prefers criminal revision petition within three weeks of passing of this order alongwith an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condonation of delay in filing criminal revision petition, the application shall be considered sympathetically in view of the fact that the petitioners have approached this Court by way of present petition.

October 8, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) Pkapoor JUDGE PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.10.09 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document