Jaman Singh v. State Of Haryana
Date of decision: 17th September, 2015 Jaman Singh
Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
Respondent ! "# $ $ 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr. Vikas Bali, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana with SI Sumitra, Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate for the complainant.
$%
# Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Jaman Singh in case FIR No.74 dated 03.03.2015 registered at Police Station Bhupani, District Faridabad under Sections 376/506/3549D IPC and Sections 669A/679A of the I.T. Act.
Vide order dated 14.05.2015 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioner was granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating/Arresting Officer. RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.18 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
Learned State Counsel, on instructions from SI Sumitra, Police Station Bhupani, District Faridabad submits that there is no evidence as to the offence of rape that has come in the medical and that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 14.05.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
The petition stands disposed off accordingly.
$ $&'(&)*&+%
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.18 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court