Virender Kumar v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-15863-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-15863 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 08, 2017 Virender Kumar ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. M.K. Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. Deepak Yadav, D.A.G. Haryana.

Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.53 dated 17.03.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Radaur, District Yamuna Nagar.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has since been amicably settled vide compromise and the terms of the compromise have been reduced in writing in settlement of agreement dated 28.11.2017. Learned counsel appearing for complainant also endorses the Sachin Mehta 2017.12.11 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-15863-2017 -2submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and has no objection if the order dated 19.05.2017 is made absolute.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioner has joined the investigation, which is still in progress but his custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of further investigation. In view of settlement between the parties and submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 19.05.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court;

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court, which the trial Court will decide on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) December 08, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.12.11 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH