Sonu v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9424 of 2020 DATE OF DECISION :- March 06, 2020 Sonu
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Bharat Bhushan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the complainant. *** Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition but he states that the trial Court be directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.
Permission is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously by giving short adjournments and reason for grant of adjournment be recorded the interim order. The needful be done preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order in that Court. (H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE March 06, 2020 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2020.03.06 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh