← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/16818/2016disposed of

Shubham Kapoor v. State Of Haryana And ANR

2016-08-23Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-16818 OF 2016 Date of decision : August 23, 2016 Shubham Kapoor ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. Vishal S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent Mr. Nitin Narula, Advocate, for respondent No. 2 Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) Report dated 10.6.2016 of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Indri has been received after recording statements of accused Shubham Kapoor as well as complainant Rashmi Lamba and the learned court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is an outcome of voluntariness, free will and without any coercion or undue pressure. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and in view of the fact that compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute and to bring about personal harmony and more-so the offences for which the accused have been booked are not of very serious nature and it is duly accepted by the counsel for the petitioner as well as State counsel that girl and the boy have since undergone a legitimate marriage which is accepted Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.09.14 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-16818 OF 2016 -2by the complainant mother and in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others vs State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and in view of which the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No. 83 dated 2.3.2016 (Annexure P/1) registered at Police Station Indri, District Karnal under section 365 IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed, qua the present petitioner. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

( Fateh Deep Singh ) August 23, 2016 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.09.14 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.