Sumit Gupta And ANR v. State Of Ut Chandigarh And Others

CRM-M-13697-2023 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13697-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 17, 2023 Sumit Gupta and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of UT Chandigarh and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.Kanwarpal Singh Gogia, Advocate for the petitioners.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) CRM-12559-2023 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.

CRM-M-13697-2023 Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for issuance of directions to respondent No.2 to register an FIR against respondents no.3 to 6.

Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the petitioners were in police but now they are dismissed from service. He has submitted that both the petitioners have filed this representation for registration of FIR against respondents no.3 to 6, however, the same has not been taken care of.

Notice of motion to official respondents only. On asking of the Court, Mr.A.M.Punchhi, P.P, UT, Chandigarh, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/State. MEENU 2023.03.20 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-13697-2023 (O&M) -2After hearing the counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate representation raising their grievances before the appropriate authorities and if they file the same within one week from today, the respondent/authorities would decide the same in accordance with law after taking into consideration the law settled by Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalita Kumari vs Govt.of U.P. & others, 2014(1) SCC (Crl.) 524. March 17, 2023 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2023.03.20 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment