High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/1602/2017disposed of

Tamanpreet Kaur & ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2017-01-19Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-1602-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-1602 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : January 19, 2017 Tamanpreet Kaur and another ... Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Petitioners in person with Mr. Bawa Mandeep Singh, Advocate.

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 14, parents and other relatives of both the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 15.01.2016 (Annexure P-4) made by the petitioners. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner No.1Tamanpreet Kaur is 11.11.1996 as per copy of Class V Examination Certificate (Annexure P-1) and that of petitioner No.2-Sunil Kumar is 25.06.1995 as per copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate (Annexure P-2). They got married on 16.01.2017 Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-3(Colly).

In view of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2Sachin Mehta 2017.01.19 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-1602-2017 -2Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka to look into the representation 15.01.2016 (Annexure P-4) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office. However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them. (SURINDER GUPTA) January 19, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.01.19 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH