Vijay Kumar(Confined In District Jailfaridkot) v. State Of Punjab
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM-M-9796-2019 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 18, 2019 VIJAY KUMAR .....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB ....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.K. Banka, DAG, Punjab.
**** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that 07 out of 15 prosecution witnesses have been examined. He further contends that every effort shall be made for examination of the remaining prosecution witnesses and to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible.
In view of the statement of the learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage. The petition is dismissed as not pressed at this stage. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE September 18, 2019 A.Kaundal Whether speaking/ reasoned :
Yes/No Whether Reportable :
Yes/No AMIT KAUNDAL 2019.09.18 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document