High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/16090/2017allowed

Krishan Kumar v. State Of Haryana

2017-11-09Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-16090-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-16090 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 09, 2017.

Krishan Kumar ..........PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Haryana ........RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. Deepak Grewal, D.A.G. Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.119 dated 20.02.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Civil Lines, Karnal.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has since been amicably settled with complainant Om Parkash on 03.11.2017. Under the compromise, entire payment has been made to the complainant and he has also withdrawn his complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, which was pending before Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Karnal. Copy of order dated 03.11.2017 passed by Judicial Magistrate 1st Sachin Mehta 2017.11.09 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-16090-2017 -2Class, Karnal along with copy of compromise and statements of the parties have been filed, which are taken on record.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ramesh Chand submits that the parties have apprised the Investigating Officer of the compromise.

Keeping in view of the above facts but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 19.05.2017 granting interim bail to the petitioner, is made absolute, subject to following terms:- a. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

b. In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh.

c. He shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the Court.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) November 09, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.11.09 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh